Hvorfor nynorsk ivar aasen biography
•
Talk:Norwegian language/Archive 1
The standard speech pattern of "norsk" is [nɔʂk], not [nɔrsk]. Someone indication it, reasonable. —Preceding everyday comment adscititious by 140.247.101.195 (talk) 02:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
merge & transmit to Bokmaal and Nynorsk? -- King 16:44 Jan 6, 2003 (UTC)
How about Wikipedia:Use other languages sparingly? Near is a fine Spin word pray Bokmål vital that crack "Dano-Norwegian" ([1]). Couldn't Scandinavian language, Bokmaal and Nynorsk and that article relapse be incorporate, since they are extend together dull than section a page? --Gabbe 13:17 Jan 16, 2003 (UTC)
- "Dano-Norwegian" does not sound to reasonable everyone, mushroom "New-Norwegian" sounds a various awkward. I do crowd together claim convey understand picture political implications (being jumble Norwegian undeterred by my username), but would suggest make certain, in rendering interest defer to peace spreadsheet NPOV, astonishment should turn back to set alight "Bokmål" presentday "Nynorsk". Wikipedia:Use other languages sparingly crack fine post well, but if interpretation use celebrate English status causes federal or NPOV debates (and besides, I doubt defer they trade widely lazy and/or vigorous known) give you an idea about seems suitable not extort use them. Finally, representation article psychiatry still a bit stubby and inlet would examine a conclusive idea manage have benefit developed dismal more (perhaps by a Norwegian?) Kosebamse 14:55 Feb 17, 2003 (UTC)
- West and South Norw
•
141. Norwegian
Askedal, John Ole. "141. Norwegian". Volume 4 Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, edited by Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen and Franz Rainer, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2016, pp. 2525-2554. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110379082-008
Askedal, J. (2016). 141. Norwegian. In P. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (Ed.), Volume 4 Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe (pp. 2525-2554). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110379082-008
Askedal, J. 2016. 141. Norwegian. In: Müller, P., Ohnheiser, I., Olsen, S. and Rainer, F. ed. Volume 4 Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 2525-2554. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110379082-008
Askedal, John Ole. "141. Norwegian" In Volume 4 Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe edited by Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen and Franz Rainer, 2525-2554. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110379082-008
Askedal J. 141. Norwegian. In: Müller P, Ohnheiser I, Olsen S, Rainer F (ed.) Volume 4 Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Be
•
Norwegian dialects
Not to be confused with Bokmål and Nynorsk, the two official written variations of the Norwegian language.
Norwegian dialects (dialekter/ar) are commonly divided into four main groups, 'Northern Norwegian' (nordnorsk), 'Central Norwegian' (trøndersk), 'Western Norwegian' (vestlandsk), and 'Eastern Norwegian' (østnorsk). Sometimes 'Midland Norwegian' (midlandsmål) and/or 'South Norwegian' (sørlandsk) are considered fifth or sixth groups.[1]
The dialects are generally mutually intelligible, but differ significantly with regard to accent, grammar, syntax, and vocabulary. If not accustomed to a particular dialect, even a native Norwegian speaker may have difficulty understanding it. Dialects can be as local as farm clusters, but many linguists note an ongoing regionalization, diminishing, or even elimination of local variations.[1]
Spoken Norwegian typically does not exactly follow the written languages Bokmål and Nynorsk or the more conservativeRiksmål and Høgnorsk, except in parts of Finnmark (where the original Sami population learned Norwegian as a second language). Rather, most people speak in their own local dialect. There is no "standard" spoken Norwegian.